Archive for the ‘Government’ Category

George, Nicholas and Wilhelm: A Preview

Wednesday, March 24th, 2010

The Wavering Road to World War I

We still struggle to integrate the results of World War I into so many areas of our lives. The Balfour Agreement encouraged Jews to emigrate to Palestine. The current wars in Iraq and Afghanistan point to the fall of the British and Ottoman Empires. The ‘Great War’ turned petroleum into a strategic commodity and presaged how important globalization would become. If we catalog all international situations currently in play, we can trace most back to the period surrounding World War I. During the entire period ~1870-1920 many vectors of history veered to the directions we now head. Of the 6500+ years of history I now study, I can declare, without equivocation, that the period leading up to World War I the most complex period of all.

Many issues led up to WWI, but one that piques my interest in this book deals with three monarchies central to the conflict. One can easily see through brif investigation that these systems of government had become inadequate and obsolete.

the author’s account observes a profound anachronism at play: that these three monarchs, in what they didn’t realize were the waning days of the institution of monarchy, handled foreign diplomacy as if it were a family business.

Europe plunged over the precipice of war in August 1914, revealing in stark terms the inability of royal familial ties to control and contain national disagreements; as the author has it, the fact that Wilhelm, Nicholas, and George were out of touch with actual politics could not have been more apparent.

http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/1400043638?ie=UTF8&tag=mundaneastrol-20&linkCode=as2&camp=1789&creative=390957&creativeASIN=1400043638">George, Nicholas and Wilhelm: Three Royal Cousins and the Road to World War I</a><img src=” target=”_blank”>Amazon.com: George, Nicholas and Wilhelm: Three Royal Cousins and the Road to World War I

What readers of Ramble should know is that the period  included the transition from one Neptune-Pluto wave to another 1399Neptune-Pluto1892 to 1893Neptune-Pluto2384, a once in ~495 year event, while two major outer planet transits also appeared in the same period. The outer planet transits for sure mirror the complexity of the times.

Throughout 1399Neptune-Pluto1892 populations looked to monarchies to lead them through history. Few may have suspected that the title ‘monarch’ did not necessarily confer intellect or ability. In http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/0345349571?ie=UTF8&tag=mundaneastrol-20&linkCode=as2&camp=1789&creative=390957&creativeASIN=0345349571">A Distant Mirror: The Calamitous 14th Century</a><img src="http://www.assoc-amazon.com/e/ir?t=mundaneastrol-20&l=as2&o=1&a=0345349571" width="1" height="1" border="0" alt="" style="border:none !important; margin:0px !important;" /> ” target=”_blank”>Distant Mirror: The Calamitous 14th Century, Barabara Tuchman’s excellent tome, a theme of leaders’ incompetence appears continually. Between then and the book’s period governments had improved, but the reliance on monarchy and dynasty continued to stifle governments meeting the needs of the time.

I leave with a quote , but based on the reviews, I recommend adding this to your collection.

The real tragedy was that neither George, Nicholas nor Wilhelm was built to adapt to a changing world; their time was evaporating. “As great mass movements took hold of Europe,” Ms. Carter observes, “the courts and their kings cleaved to the past, set up high walls of etiquette to keep the world out and defined themselves through form, dress and precedence.”
http://www.nytimes.com/2010/03/24/books/24book.html?ref=books” target=”_blank”>Books of the Times: As War Loomed, 3 Leaders Wandered Lost

  • Share/Bookmark

Nationalism: We’re Still Learning

Monday, February 22nd, 2010
Nationalist tendencies are a natural extension of living in a nation. One should have a born-in inclination to have an affinity with fellow citizens, right?
Not quite. Nationalism as we know it began after the French Revolution, but really did not take root until well into the 19 th Century. And what is nationalism? Is there one type, easily defined? Hardly. Japanese nationalism differs from the Chinese type. In China, one must ask whether citizens share pride with fellow Chinese or with the (pseudo) Communist state. An answer on either side of this query holds many possibilities. China combines many nationalities and ethnic groups who have their own legacy and agenda. China seems communist in name only, but how the people actually feel about the state is difficult to determine since the state so closely controls public opinion.

A look at the United States, a model for national independence since its inception, raises other questions about nationalism. Unlike many regions or nations that came before or since, the US succeeds on the basis of accepting all nationalities; its nationalism rides on ideas and principles. This survey does not judge whether one system works better than another, It is here to point out that nationalism has no one cause or reason. Ideas and ethnicity work side-by-side in today’s world.

So what’s the point? The point is that when you hear “We’re the greatest,” or “you ‘re unpatriotic!”, one has to ask: the greatest at an abstract concept that could be either ethnicity or an ideal or both? Unpatriotic to an ideal that evolves as we move forward? For instance, can a Chinese person who was patriotic to China pre-communism, be patriotic to China? Communist China? Or to whatever ethnicity, s/he may be part of?

Let’s look at present day or Iran. Should one be patriotic to the current corrupt regime? To the Ayatollah (now out of power)? Or to the opposition?

To be sure, the definition of nationalism is an uncertain one. We should keep this in mind as we move forward, dealing with issues that seemingly pit nation against nation.

  • Share/Bookmark

Kill All the Politicians…

Friday, July 31st, 2009

And What Happens?

Anarchy. And not the good kind. Governance seldom looks pretty, but looks better than the alternative.

Hug a Politician

And you will likely face criminal charges. But realize the courage it takes to represent the people. If a poliltican pisses everyone off , s/he is likely doing a good job.

No Hugs Needed

But stop whining about the system and the people who are part of it. Remember, that you are part of that system (no self-hating). Like capitalism, western-style government may not be perfect, but it is the best we have. Don’t stop constructive criticism, but please keep perspective.

  • Share/Bookmark
WordPress SEO fine-tune by Meta SEO Pack from Poradnik Webmastera